🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."